It’s been a rough week for documentary films in my life. It was
environmental film week, which excited me and had me watching the docs early. Environmentalism
is one of my favorite subjects. Its role was central and should have made a
great show. However, I was sorely disappointed.
Both films
featured strong narrators who drove the plots of the films. While this stylistic
choice can work well in certain cases, both narrators in these particular films
projected inflated egos that distracted the viewer from the important environmental
issues presented. Each narrator thought themselves very important to their
causes. And to some degree, they thought they were more important than their causes.
As a proponent
of environmental advocacy, I was seething in my chair as these pretentious men
shoved their personal agendas down my throat. I couldn’t even finish An Inconvenient Truth as Al Gore’s
gentle-yet-oh-so-i-know-everything voice pummeled through my tolerance levels,
leaving my internal thoughts screaming for respite. I felt irksome pains, carrying the force of a juggernaut, roll over me every time he spoke of his personal life story. Maybe I'm just a disgruntled anarchist, but his demeanor completely pissed me off. Watch for yourself.
"That brings up the basic science of global warming. And I'm not going to spend a lot of time on that because, uh, you know it well," he says. Oh the pains, they're rolling over me again. They make me relate to Louis CK when he asked Donald Rumsfeld,
“Are you a lizard?”
Al, dude, you are a failed
presidential candidate attempting to reclaim your self-pride by making your
face the face of the global warming
issue, a topic over which you have zero authority. This film was supposed to be
about one of the most threatening issues our Earth faces currently and you’re
telling me about your dad’s life as a cattle rancher. You are not cool. You are
not smooth. You exploited the cause of environmental justice to further yourself
in the eyes of society. Congratulations, Al. You even succeeded, winning the
Nobel Prize for your work.
Werner Boote, in Plastic Planet, was less egotistical in his narration, but not much better. He probably thought his
ability to speak in countless languages heightened his persona, but he missed
the mark on the personality bit substantially. To give Boote some credit, he
did seem more interested in his cause than Gore.
I’m left shaking my head in memory
of these two men on my computer screen. I am angry. I feel like they profited
from the issues that the earth is currently suffering just so they could
profit, not so they could change the blight of the environment. The latter
cause is the true purpose of environmental films – to empower the people and make
the world healthier. I was left wanting far more from these two men, who cared
more about their roles than the issues they preached.
Let me start out by saying, I love this post. You took so many thoughts out of my head and wrote about them and I'm just sitting here like, "YES!" Both narrators were so egotistical and both bothered me. I didn't have as much of the harsh feelings toward Al Gore as you did, but as I watched his film, I just wondered why his personal story mattered and why he put it in. I thought that was very self centered of him and took away from the cause. I also got very annoyed with Werner Boote and his constantly switching languages. I felt, as you did, the main point was taken out of two documentaries that could have had a better effect on people, had some changes been made.
ReplyDeleteThis post is fantastic, Erin. I loved reading it. Whether or not I agree with every point you make, your voice is so clear and always so "you." I really appreciate your word choice and the personality you inject into your writing. As I read, I can hear you saying it. I agree that both Boote and Gore surrounded the films very blatantly around themselves. I was irritated by the distraction of Gore's personal life. You made an interesting point: "Al, dude, you are a failed presidential candidate attempting to reclaim your self-pride by making your face the face of the global warming issue, a topic over which you have zero authority." I had circled around this idea in my mind and you so clearly and decisively stated it.
ReplyDelete