Audiences often perceive environmental films as consistently
lacking central, strong, and viable solutions to the issues they pose. Audiences
tend to experience pessimistic feelings about what they’ve seen as they are
unable to latch onto one, specific solution. They want the problem to go away
through a trust in something bigger. However, as environmental documentarians
already understand, these are dangerous feelings in a capitalistic world
because the only current hope for an environmentally-conscious world is an
environmentally-conscious populace. The solution rests with consumers. Many come
away from the Plastic Planet feeling
hopelessness and maybe Boote could have more effectively empowered his audience,
but we need to be aware that the solution rests with our choices. Environmental
documentaries empower the will and provide the mind knowledge, revealing to
audiences that we are the solution. Under the current society, this idea could
transform our planet, giving us hope for change without ignorance.
I know I've complained about lack of solutions in environmental films. I do try to be environmentally conscious, but I'm still left frustrated at the end of such documentaries. Even though An Inconvenient Truth has a more optimistic ending than Plastic Planet, it left a more sour taste in my mouth. Al Gore yells about how we CAN change this, but he doesn't offer an solution we can help with. At least Werner Boots was honestly pessimistic.
ReplyDelete